From: An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics
Moves | Textual space of move | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | P3 | Avg | ||
Move 1 | Establishing a territory | 27 % | 32 % | 80 % | 46 % |
Strategy 1 | Claiming centrality and/or a | – | 5 | 2 | |
Strategy 2 | Making topic generalizations | – | 3 | 7 | |
Strategy 3 | Reviewing items of previous research | 34 | – | 35 | |
Strategy 4 | Stating personal interest | – | 14 | – | |
Move 2 | Establishing a niche | 11 % | 16 % | 0 % | 9 % |
Strategy 1 | Indicating a gap | 14 | 11 | – | |
Move 3 | Occupying the niche | 17 % | 30 % | 16 % | 21 % |
Strategy 1 | Outlining purposes | 14 | 17 | 9 | |
Strategy 2 | Spelling out contribution/significance of proposed research | 8 | 4 | – | |
Move 4 | Establishing theoretical basis | 9 % | 0 % | 0 % | 3 % |
Strategy 1 | Reviewing literature relevant to theory | 1 | – | – | |
Strategy 2 | Defining theory | 2 | – | – | |
Strategy 3 | Explaining theory | 9 | – | – | |
Move 5 | Spelling out methodology | 34 % | 12 % | 2 % | 16 % |
Strategy 1 | Delimiting the scope of study | 2 | – | – | |
Strategy 2 | Defining terms | 10 | – | – | |
Strategy 3 | Describing data | – | 1 | – | |
Strategy 4 | Describing subjects | 10 | – | – | |
Strategy 5 | Describing experiment | 12 | – | – | |
Strategy 6 | Describing analytical procedure | 9 | 6 | – | |
Strategy 7 | Indicating analytical framework | – | 1 | 1 | |
Move 6 | Achieving closure | 2 % | 10 % | 2 % | 4.7 % |
Strategy 1 | Reiterating purpose | – | 1 | 1 | |
Strategy 2 | Restating significance of proposed research | – | 6 | – | |
Strategy 3 | Indicating limitation of proposed research | 3 | – | – |