Skip to main content

Table 3 Moves and relative textual space across three proposals

From: An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics

Moves

Textual space of move

P1

P2

P3

Avg

Move 1

Establishing a territory

27 %

32 %

80 %

46 %

 Strategy 1

 Claiming centrality

and/or a

5

2

 

 Strategy 2

 Making topic generalizations

3

7

 

 Strategy 3

 Reviewing items of previous research

34

35

 

 Strategy 4

 Stating personal interest

14

 

Move 2

Establishing a niche

11 %

16 %

0 %

9 %

 Strategy 1

 Indicating a gap

14

11

 

Move 3

Occupying the niche

17 %

30 %

16 %

21 %

 Strategy 1

 Outlining purposes

14

17

9

 

 Strategy 2

 Spelling out contribution/significance of proposed research

8

4

 

Move 4

Establishing theoretical basis

9 %

0 %

0 %

3 %

 Strategy 1

 Reviewing literature relevant to theory

1

 

 Strategy 2

 Defining theory

2

 

 Strategy 3

 Explaining theory

9

 

Move 5

Spelling out methodology

34 %

12 %

2 %

16 %

 Strategy 1

 Delimiting the scope of study

2

 

 Strategy 2

 Defining terms

10

 

 Strategy 3

 Describing data

1

 

 Strategy 4

 Describing subjects

10

 

 Strategy 5

 Describing experiment

12

 

 Strategy 6

 Describing analytical procedure

9

6

 

 Strategy 7

 Indicating analytical framework

1

1

 

Move 6

Achieving closure

2 %

10 %

2 %

4.7 %

 Strategy 1

 Reiterating purpose

1

1

 

 Strategy 2

 Restating significance of proposed research

6

 

 Strategy 3

 Indicating limitation of proposed research

3

 
  1. aThe relationship between all strategies within moves in the present study is and/or